You will also be able to speak with her on the phone if you need to (Yes, you read that right! You can actually speak to your loan officer, just the way America used to be)
They have excellent communication you will be working with the same loan processor I team up with she is one of the very best ALC has on staff. They are a small lender, fully staffed, and capable of handling a lot more applications than they are receiving.
Knowing what I know about most of the funders out there, I would recommend you apply with American Lending Center in Long Beach, CA. You can view all future deBanked events here.That depends on your pain tolerance level. Connect with me on LinkedIn or follow me on twitter. Sean Murray is the President and Chief Editor of deBanked and the founder of the Broker Fair Conference. By the report’s own weak logic, the United States Congress could also be characterized as a fintech. The committee that published its report should change the title and nearly all mentions of fintech throughout. It would be fair to chastise bad actions and bad actors exposed in the report, but to take a multi-billion dollar industry that has been built up over a decade and have it defined by a cell phone accessory store owner and an online reputation management company hardly seems fair. NY Post: Tech firms defrauded feds by brokering shady PPP loans to collect fees: report NBC News: Executives at ‘fintechs’ made hundreds of millions handing out PPP Covid cash, report says Select Subcommittee Press Release: New Select Subcommittee Report Reveals How Fintech Companies Facilitated Fraud In The Paycheck Protection Program ProPublica: Fintechs Made “Massive Profits” on PPP Loans and Sometimes Engaged in Fraud, House Committee Report Finds Ultimately, as a company with no background in lending or finance, investigators were shocked to discover what had taken place along the way. Encouraged by its early successes, Womply went on to generate $2 billion in fees for its role in facilitating PPP loans. That was just in 2020 when it earned only $3 million in fees. “Womply entered into referral agent agreements with ten lenders or platforms and ultimately referred approximately 7,000 PPP loans totaling $360 million in taxpayer dollars while acting as a referral agent,” the report says. Womply had no ties to lending or fintech until it suddenly became a PPP loan broker in April 2020.
The real villain of this mess? Fintech obviously!Ī fintech is how investigators cast Womply, an online reputation management company that helped people manage their reviews online.
Inevitably, fraud piled up, bad things happened, wrongdoing may have occurred, and Blueacorn was somehow paid a billion dollars for its work. In the eyes of investigators, this apparently qualifies as a fintech.Īs 1.7 million loan applications poured in to Blueacorn, the company then relied on an affiliated company that hired friends and family members that had little to no experience and got virtually no training to process the loans. This highly technologically advanced company consisted of “off-the-shelf fraud screening software” and a “single direct employee who assisted with processing PPP applications,” according to the report. According to the report, the CEO and co-founder of Blueacorn was in the business of selling cell phone accessories until he founded Blueacorn for the singular purpose of facilitating PPP loans. Of course everyone knows Blueacorn because they… oh wait, they probably don’t because up until April 2020 Blueacorn did not even exist. How this happened is laid out in 130 pages of detail that seemingly puts the brunt of the blame on Blueacorn, a purported fintech that was paid $1 billion in SBA processing fees for its role in facilitating PPP loans. According to a newly published congressional committee investigative report, fintechs facilitated PPP fraud.
0 kommentar(er)
